Smurfing = Cheating

TAUniverse (http://www.tauniverse.com/forum/index.php)

Posted by xRelativityx007 on 04-11-2002 07:14 PM:
Smurfing = Cheating
According to ThinkTank, smurfing is cheating.
That’s what he told me, and called me a cheater for smurfing him.
Also, he mentioned that if he comm bombs me and he shares all units to his ally,
that means that he beat me and that he is better.
I just thought I’d mention this, since TT likes to point this out soooo many
times.
So what do you all think?

Posted by BLITZ_Molloy on 04-12-2002 02:58 AM:

I think TT has always been a pain in the arse. Take no notice of him.

…::tau::…::blitz::…::ucs::…
“To be this good takes ages”


Altered Beast | UberCrack Shack | BLITZ Clan
Latest Annihilarity: Annihilarity: Weapon Inspection II

Posted by VeZoZ on 04-12-2002 10:24 AM:

Rel read a couple of the latest JKIDS. He also claims he is the best player
cause he doesn’t lag or smurf.

Owner Of Ultimate-Strategy and Ultimate-Gaming Network
[This message has been edited by BTU_VeZoZ (edited April 12, 2002
on 10:25 AM).]


Some people think I’m an idiot. I disagree, but idiocy is subjective–so they
may well be right. With this in mind, take everything I post with a grain of
salt, eh

Posted by Annihilater2k1 on 04-12-2002 11:26 AM:

WTF, is smurfing?


The weak have one weapon, the over-confidence of those who think they are
strong.


The weak have one weapon, the over-confidence of those who think they are
strong.

Posted by xRelativityx007 on 04-12-2002 12:12 PM:

Smurfing is using another name, one that usually doesn’t have any relation to
the one you usually use and then using that name and playing someone you know to
surprise them (since they would have been thinking that they were playing a
stranger).
Apparently, TT says it’s cheating

Posted by Vali on 04-12-2002 12:22 PM:

lol
Don’t know about Smurfing, but the commander suicide thing i think it’s fair.
You shoud never keep your comander in a vulnerable place for that to happend.
A few MT in the right place won’t let this hapend.
If he does it when you bouth have allies, then it’s fair. (kind of…)
1 of his team dies, and 1 of yours. (if that works)

Posted by tau’ri01 on 04-12-2002 04:26 PM:

Not really… if it eliminated both players then it would be, but it doesnt. The
point of the 2v2 comm bomb is to entirely turn the game around, as the guy who
is losing his comm shares all his units, so efeectivly, his team goes down one
comm unit. The other tam however, loses not only one player’s comm, but the
entirity of that players units, as they have no time to prepare and share units.
Thus, it is not cheating, but its not really a very friendly thing to do either.

Its something unpredictable, but in the end is right…


Its something unpredictable, but in the end is right…

Posted by ~burn-out~ on 04-12-2002 08:11 PM:

smufing is cheating thats the lamest thing ever. TT is an idiot newbie dont pay
attenion to him.


-some peoples kids.
-along the road of life stupid people must be killed.
-Gott sch黷zen mich vor mich

Posted by BTU_Weston on 04-13-2002 06:30 AM:

no you are confused… thinktank said the act of com bombing and giving means he
automatically wins. not the result from it. i was present when all this unfolded
on zone so…

Posted by A_Novice_ToS on 04-13-2002 06:59 AM:

But TT is still a **** - he refuses to play me because i lag too much o_0

Posted by ~burn-out~ on 04-13-2002 04:08 PM:

because hes a newbie and he knows you would crush him.


-some peoples kids.
-along the road of life stupid people must be killed.
-Gott sch黷zen mich vor mich

Posted by Skyliner on 04-13-2002 05:51 PM:

Smurfing = Cheating
That is like saying Spamming is good ------------------ A lack of experience means a lack of brains. -=D4D=- __________________ . : Central Consciousness : . A New All Time Record: ::: Your lag on TA-IRC is above the max (248.327 seconds), press Shift + F7 to change server My lag owns even the crappiest of connections... Women need a reason for sex, men just need a place - Billy Crystal

Posted by BTU_Weston on 04-14-2002 06:40 AM:

at least he has a truthful reason nov. he says i am a cheater… he says i have a
trainer. btw i strongly believe TT and pelvisrocks are the same person. would be
funny considering hes so anti-smurf. he already admitted he has a playing name
and a name here on the boards and the personalities seem to match.
[This message has been edited by BTU_Weston (edited April 14,
2002 on 06:41 AM).]

Posted by Annihilater2k1 on 04-14-2002 07:20 AM:

I have reason to believe TT has more than 5 differant identities on PW, They all
share the same views.


The weak have one weapon, the over-confidence of those who think they are
strong.


The weak have one weapon, the over-confidence of those who think they are
strong.

Posted by Pic on 04-14-2002 08:56 AM:

I have reason to believe he has 1 name on PW and that he sucks 4 other guys
dicks all day so they share his views


[The]-[Pic]┊?


[The]-[Pic]┊?

Posted by -alacrity on 04-14-2002 03:16 PM:

what problems can u cause by smurfing? if u suck at ta, then u’ll suck no matter
what name u use


O_O

Posted by A_Novice_ToS on 04-14-2002 04:59 PM:

He still sucks no matter what

Posted by JoesGeo on 04-14-2002 06:42 PM:

what problems can u cause by smurfing? if u suck at ta, then u'll suck no matter what name u use
yuppers logical lol

Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.


quote:

Originally posted by Warchicken
I believe there is an evil spirit living in my computer, trying to drive me
mad.

Yes, I have that problem too. That spirit is referred to as Windows.

Posted by Screamer on 04-15-2002 07:14 AM:

The “problem” with smurfing is that you may get to play someone who would refuse
to play you otherwise. And not only sucky players smurf…

Although TT/Pelvis is getting seriously annoying…


The taste of truth is bitter. | You can lead an idiot to
knowledge, but you cannot make him think.


The beauty of the world has two edges, one of laughter, one of anguish, cutting
the heart asunder.
Virginia Woolf

Posted by A_Novice_ToS on 04-15-2002 08:53 AM:

If someone wont play you, its probably because they are scared to play you,
therefore i feel there is nothing wrong with playing them under a smurf name, if
its simply to get a game.

Posted by Annihilater2k1 on 04-15-2002 12:36 PM:

So really smurfing to get a game is just TA’s version of subterfuge.


The weak have one weapon, the over-confidence of those who think they are
strong.


The weak have one weapon, the over-confidence of those who think they are
strong.

Posted by LordBeek on 04-15-2002 01:22 PM:

For most players its the only way they can get games. A simple name strikes fear
into many players, and thus they will refused a game.


Proud Member of the TEA clan.

I would like to be able to admire a man抯 opinions as I would his dog - without
being expected to take it home with me

Posted by VeZoZ on 04-15-2002 02:24 PM:

I use to have that problem, or they would be like oh flour it’s a BTU they are
cheaters boot him! Now it’s like yeah whatever cause I’m so old school no one
knows who I am


Owner Of Ultimate-Strategy and Ultimate-Gaming Network


Some people think I’m an idiot. I disagree, but idiocy is subjective–so they
may well be right. With this in mind, take everything I post with a grain of
salt, eh

Posted by -alacrity on 04-15-2002 02:40 PM:

i personally do dislike smurfers, but it isn’t so bad to call it cheating


O_O

Posted by tau’ri01 on 04-15-2002 05:06 PM:

smurfing is more then justified if you are good and you just hate a player you
are better then, so you gw him and bring his war record waaaaay down


Its something unpredictable, but in the end is right…


Its something unpredictable, but in the end is right…

Posted by Fish-Bulb on 04-17-2002 04:09 PM:

I smurf all the time but it isn’t a noble thing. Basically smurfing is about
playing someone so that if you lose you don’t have to worry about people
thinking you suck, and if you win you can “unmask” yourself and claim all the
credit. It is about risk-free TA reputations games.

Posted by -alacrity on 04-17-2002 04:13 PM:

“It is about risk-free TA reputations games”

but its still unfair to your opponent since he does take risk.


O_O

Posted by Pic on 04-21-2002 12:35 AM:

an unkown ta player that is flouring good outa his mind with a 1st time name is
not a smurf… therefor a smurf is not unfair , cause people should be expecting
the best every game


[The]-[Pic]┊?


[The]-[Pic]┊?

Posted by tau’ri01 on 04-21-2002 10:21 AM:

whoa… my mind is screaming at me not to argue with pic, but what the hey i
have no brain. People dont expect the best when they play someone who they think
hs not been playing very long, so it doesnt matter if they should, because they
dont.


Its something unpredictable, but in the end is right…


Its something unpredictable, but in the end is right…

Posted by VeZoZ on 04-21-2002 11:43 AM:

Smurfing is good!


Owner Of Ultimate-Strategy and Ultimate-Gaming Network


Some people think I’m an idiot. I disagree, but idiocy is subjective–so they
may well be right. With this in mind, take everything I post with a grain of
salt, eh

Posted by BTU_S_hollo_S on 04-22-2002 12:58 AM:

Its easy to kinda think about whos good and whos not… judge ram and resolution,
latency averages… Just look at how the person acts… you can usually find
that the cool-smooth kinda unknown players the ones that have the know-how of
the game and should therefore put you on you’re edge if you think they are a
smurff; TO EXPECT, the best =)


sl4v3 t0 w0m3n

Posted by Pic on 04-22-2002 01:04 AM:

well look just because everyone has a fault of not expecting a bad *** player…
does not mean other peoples “decisions” of names and such is cheating nor
unfair… thats like saying a whopper with cheese is only sold at burgerking… so
mcdonalds cheats cause i want a flourin whopper!


[The]-[Pic]┊?

Posted by BTU_S_hollo_S on 04-22-2002 01:06 AM:

rofl!!


sl4v3 t0 w0m3n

Posted by -alacrity on 04-22-2002 03:11 PM:

the only justification of smurfing i heard so far is for good players to get
games. but good players are not the only ones that smurf. smurfing noobs are
much more annoying.

[This message has been edited by -alacrity (edited April 22, 2002
on 03:12 PM).]


O_O

Posted by tau’ri01 on 04-22-2002 05:06 PM:

What are you talking about… if they are a n00b… and they smurf… so they
play under a different mname, and still suck? So what does it matter? Unless you
mean a crap player smurfing as Rock or pic or something…


Its something unpredictable, but in the end is right…


Its something unpredictable, but in the end is right…

Posted by Screamer on 04-22-2002 11:27 PM:

Then there are the folks who just smurf in order to be able to run their mouth
without affecting their “real” nick’s image…


The taste of truth is bitter. | You can lead an idiot to
knowledge, but you cannot make him think.


The beauty of the world has two edges, one of laughter, one of anguish, cutting
the heart asunder.
Virginia Woolf

Posted by Annihilater2k1 on 04-23-2002 12:13 PM:

Dum di dum dum dum…i dont know what yer on about Screamer…


The weak have one weapon, the over-confidence of those who think they are
strong.


The weak have one weapon, the over-confidence of those who think they are
strong.

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:09 AM.
Show 40 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.4
Copyright ?Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2004.
@Copyright 2001-2004 Nexus Entertainment, LLC.